Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 F.2d 284 - United States v. Lacy

United States v. Lacy’s Empirical Analysis

643 F.2d 284 · 1981

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2008

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

50198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Johnson · Chambers v. Texas · Calley v. Callaway · Francis T. Glynn v. Robert Donnelly, John M. Farrell v. Robert Donnelly · Baker v. Sard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who has been convicted of an offense and sentenced to a term of confinement or imprisonment and has filed an appeal or a petition for writ of certiorari shall be detained unless the judicial officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or to the property of others, and (2) the appeal or petition for a writ of certiorari raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in a reversal or an order for new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.