Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 F.2d 86 - Rivera v. Harris

Rivera v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

643 F.2d 86 · 1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2011

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · North Carolina v. Pearce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the state trial court makes findings purporting to demonstrate the validity of the conviction, petitioner may return to the District Court and renew his habeas corpus challenge to his conviction. At that point, the issue will be whether the state court conviction, considered in light of the acquittal of petitioner's co-defendant and in light of the state trial court's findings, denies petitioner his liberty without due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “For the foregoing reasons we reverse the District Court's judgment and remand with directions to enter an order conditionally vacating petitioner's conviction and awarding him a new trial unless the state trial court demonstrates by appropriate findings rendered within ninety days that petitioner's conviction is valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “in prohibiting inconsistent bench trial verdicts, Maybury does not purport to rest on any provision of the Constitution and may well have been decided solely in the exercise of the Court's supervisory power over the administration of criminal justice within this Circuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.