Smith v. Bubak’s Empirical Analysis
643 F.3d 1137 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Marmo v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. · Barrett v. Rhodia, Inc. · 262 Mich. App. 518 - Ensink v. Mecosta County General Hospital · Jorgenson v. Vener
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To satisfy the reliability requirement, the party offering the expert testimony “must show by a preponderance of the evidence both that the expert is qualified to render the opinion and that the methodology underlying his conclusions is scientifically valid.” To satisfy the relevance requirement, the proponent must show that the expert’s reasoning or methodology was applied properly to the facts at issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. FCA US LLC“'the proponent must show that the expert's reasoning or methodology was applied properly to the facts at issue.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.