Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 F.3d 1306 - Craig v. Floyd County

Craig v. Floyd County’s Empirical Analysis

643 F.3d 1306 · 2011

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
June 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · City of Canton v. Harris · Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown · City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Proof of a single incident of unconstitutional activity is not sufficient to impose liability” against a municipality. “A pattern of similar constitutional violations ... is ‘ordinarily necessary.’ ” “A single incident would not be so pervasive as to be a custom,” because a custom must be such “a longstanding and widespread practice [that it] is deemed authorized by the policymaking officials because they must have known about it but failed to stop it.” This requirement of proof “prevents the imposition of liability based upon an isolated incident,” and “ ‘ensures that a municipality is held liable only for those deprivations resulting from the decisions of its duly constituted legislative body or of those officials whose acts may fairly be said to be those of the municipality.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A single incident of a constitutional violation is insufficient to prove a policy or custom even when the incident involves several [subordinates].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “review[ ] de novo summary judgment rulings and draw[ ] all inferences and review[ ] all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.