Wilson v. Roy’s Empirical Analysis
643 F.3d 433 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Santos · Reyes-Requena v. United States · Cuellar v. United States · Sylvester Tolliver v. Jonathon Dobre · Garland Jeffers v. Ernest Chandler US
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“proceeds” is not intended to mean trofits” where the predicate offense involves the sale of contraband; rather,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.