Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 F.3d 802 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

643 F.3d 802 · 2011

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Begay v. United States · Sykes v. United States · Sykes v. United States · State v. Coyote · United States v. McConnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person who knowingly or intentionally: (3) flees from a law enforcement officer after the officer has, by visible or audible means, identified himself and ordered the person to stop; commits resisting law enforcement, a Class A misdemeanor, except as provided in subsection (b). (b) The offense under subsection (a) is a: (1) Class D felony if: (A) the offense is described in subsection (a)(3) and the person uses a vehicle to commit the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Court stated that the Indiana offense was not excluded from the residual clause by the exception set forth in Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137 [ 128 S.Ct. 1581 , 170 L.Ed.2d 490 ] (2008), for “strict liability, negligence, and recklessness crime[s]” even when they present serious risks of physical injury; it explained that the Indiana statute had the “stringent mens rea requirement” that the defendant act “knowingly or intentionally.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or (2) is burglary of a dwelling, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.