Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 F.3d 994 - Walton v. Bayer Corp.

Walton v. Bayer Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

643 F.3d 994 · 2011

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1653

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Hagans v. Lavine · State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. Rogers · 117 Ill. 2d 507 - Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] plaintiff can defeat the fraudulent joinder exception to the requirement of complete diversity of citizenship by proving that his claim against the nondiverse defendant is no weaker than his claim against the diverse defendants.... [Tlhe diverse defendants really are just arguing that the suit has no merit, period. And that is a ground not for removal but for asking the court in which the suit was filed—the state court—to dismiss the suit.”); Fee v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L. C., 2014 WL 2769119 , (E.D.Ky. June 18, 2014) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.