643 F. Supp. 26 - Berning v. Gooding’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2003
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 601 · 7 U.S.C. § 602 · 7 U.S.C. § 608 · 7 U.S.C. § 608B · 7 U.S.C. § 608C (Food and Agriculture Act of 1965)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Parker v. Brown · United States v. Borden Co. · Silver v. New York Stock Exchange
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“establish and maintain ... orderly marketing conditions for agricultural commodities”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berning v. Gooding“immune for acts committed within their statutory authority”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“validly agreed upon or directed by the Secretary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.