In Re Giant Interactive Group, Inc. Securities Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) · 15 U.S.C. § 77D (§ 4 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77Z (§ 26 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Erickson v. Pardus · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.