Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 N.E.2d 417 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 182 Ind. App. 156 - Roddy v. State · Barker v. State · Jones v. State · Heald v. State · O'CONNER v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a prosecutor charges the greater offense in language closely tracking the statutory definition of that offense and the prosecutor does not insert additional language showing an intent to charge any lesser offenses, the information must be held to charge only the greater offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if the information actually charged all the elements of the lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.