Kiner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cherek v. United States · Roberts v. Louisiana · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Boyd v. North Carolina · United States v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After the jury have retired for deliberation, if there is a disagreement between them as to any part of the testimony, or if they desire to be informed as to any point of law arising in the case, they may request the officer to conduct them into court, where the information required shall be given in the presence of, or after notice to, the parties or their attorneys.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Pettrie v. State · State v. Winters“It is improper conduct for the Government to ask a question which implies a factual predicate which the examiner knows [he or she] cannot support by evidence or for which [he or she] has no reason to believe that there is a foundation of truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[ulaless the jury manifests disagreement about the testimony or seeks clarification on legal issues, the trial court is under no duty to respond to the jury's request.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dowdy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.