State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Minn. R. Evid. 704. Stewart does not dispute that Dr. Swenson is a qualified medical expert whose testimony about abusive head trauma was helpful to the jury. 4 But he argues the district court abused its discretion by admitting her testimony that B.G.D.'s injuries were caused by abusive head trauma because (1) the state failed to demonstrate in response to his pretrial motion that the opinion had”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Stewart