Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 SE2D 23 - In Re CT

In Re CT’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Ballard · In Re Young · 112 N.C. App. 747 - Matter of Safriet · 173 N.C. App. 1 - In Re PLP · 124 N.C. App. 332 - Starco, Inc. v. AMG Bonding & Insurance Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failure to issue a summons deprives the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction,”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) . . . [U]pon the filing of the [termination] petition, the court shall cause a summons to be issued. The summons shall be directed to the following persons or agency, not otherwise a party petitioner, who shall be named as respondents: . . . . (5) The juvenile. . . . Except that the summons and other pleadings or papers directed to the juvenile shall be served upon the juvenile's guardian ad litem if one has been appointed. . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] case . . . where a statutorily required summons was not issued regarding a proceeding concerning a juvenile [is] a situation different from that presented by technical defects in service of a summons.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.