In Re JL’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Matter of Montgomery · 127 N.C. App. 505 - Matter of Helms · 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] juvenile in need of assistance or placement because the juvenile has no parent, guardian, or custodian responsible for the juvenile's care or supervision or whose parent, guardian, or custodian is unable to provide for the care or supervision and lacks an appropriate alternative child care arrangement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re LH“to adjudicate [the child] as dependent, the trial court was required to find that respondent, [the child's] father, was either unable to care for [the child] himself, or was unable to secure an alternative child care arrangement”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re LH
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.