Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 SE2D 644 - In Re BM

In Re BM’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Matter of Montgomery · 127 N.C. App. 505 - Matter of Helms · 141 N.C. App. 475 - In Re Gleisner · 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM · In Re SNH

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court must address both (1) the parent's ability to provide care or supervision, and (2) the availability to the parent of alternative child care arrangements.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Findings of fact addressing both prongs must be made before a juvenile may be adjudicated as dependent, and the court's failure to make these findings will result in reversal of the court.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] juvenile in need of assistance or placement because the juvenile has no parent, guardian, or custodian responsible for the juvenile's care or supervision or whose parent, guardian, or custodian is unable to provide for the care or supervision and lacks an appropriate alternative child care arrangement.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.