Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 SE2D 77 - In Re DRB

In Re DRB’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd. · Quick v. Quick · Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · Coble v. Coble · 140 N.C. App. 288 - In Re Huff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For this Court to exercise its appellate function, the trial court must enter sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law to reveal the reasoning which led to the court's ultimate decision.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the standard for appellate review is whether the trial court's findings of fact are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and whether those findings of fact support its conclusions of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Without an identified basis for the court's adjudication under [N.C.G.S.] § 7B-1109(e), we cannot effectively review the termination order.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.