Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 So. 2d 1291 - Quick v. Murphy Oil Co.

643 So. 2d 1291 - Quick v. Murphy Oil Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. (2009), 784 So. 2d 46 - Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Chevrolet Motor Division, General Motors Corp. · Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proceeds from the assumption that more than one defendant substantially contributed to the plaintiff's injury.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hether the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor is a question for the jury, unless the court determines that reasonable men could not differ.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.