643 So. 2d 132 - State v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp. v. Hoopa Valley Tribe · 631 So. 2d 427 - State v. Pierre · 354 So. 2d 1334 - State v. Sutfield · 563 So. 2d 847 - State v. Lubrano · 418 So. 2d 547 - State v. Savoy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“motive cannot alone provide the basis for determining that one spouse has `concerned' himself or herself in the fraudulent acts of the other spouse simply by reason of their common interests arising from their relational status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a trier of fact's determination that a wife aided and abetted the commission of the charged offense by her husband must rest upon more than mere speculation based upon guilt by association arising from relational status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.