Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 SO2D 3 - State v. Rivers

State v. Rivers’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 2516 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)

Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Wilkerson v. State · 345 Pa. Super. 374 - Commonwealth v. Doty · Byram v. Main

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the key issue in this case is whether the crime of prostitution is a crime `dangerous to life, limb or property and punishable by imprisonment of more than one year' such that it fits within the confines of 18 U.S.C. section 2516 (2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “murder, kidnapping, arson, gambling, robbery, burglary, theft, dealing in stolen property, prostitution, criminal usury, bribery, or extortion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “other crime dangerous to life, limb, or property, and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.