Artis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2011
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 279 So. 2d 642 - Shelton v. Kindred · 440 So. 2d 318 - Mason v. State · 347 So. 2d 957 - Branch v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The courts are empowered to revoke any or all of the defendant's probation or any part or all of the suspended sentence if, during the period of probation, it is found that the defendant violated the conditions of his probation/suspended sentence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hile this is not a revocation of probation, it stands to reason that the same due process analysis applies to revocation of suspended sentence proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The courts referred to in Section 47-7-33 or 47-7-34 shall determine the terms and conditions of probation or post-release supervision and may alter or modify, at any time during the period of probation or post-release supervision, the conditions and may include among them the following or any other: That the offender shall: (a) Commit no offense against the laws of this or any other state of the United States, or of the United States; (b) Avoid injurious or vicious habits; (c) Avoid persons or places of disreputable or harmful character; (d) Report to the probation and parole officer as directed; (e) Permit the probation and parole officer to visit him at home or elsewhere; (f) Work faithfully at suitable employment so far as possible; (g) Remain within a specified area; (h) Pay his fine in one (1) or several sums; (i) Support his dependents; (j) Submit, as provided in Section 47-5-601, to any type of breath, saliva or urine chemical analysis test, the purpose of which is to detect the possible presence of alcohol or a substance prohibited or controlled "by ■any law of the State of Mississippi or the United States; (k) Register as a sex offender if so required under Title 45, Chapter 33.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.