Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 So. 2d 597 - Archer v. State

643 So. 2d 597 - Archer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2011

10 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Deboue v. Louisiana · Harris v. State · 557 So. 2d 1292 - Callahan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he appellant did not file his motion for speedy trial until . . . over a year from the date of indictment. The fact that the appellant did not assert his right to a speedy trial sooner `tends to suggest that he either acquiesced in the delays or suffered only minimal prejudice prior to that date.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[T]he congested trial docket was a neutral reason for the delay and should not weigh heavily against the State,' . . . especially in view of the fact that the appellant did not raise a complaint during that time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “THE COURT: You say you have some testimony you would like in support of that? "MR. MILLER: [Counsel for Archer] Your Honor, the allegations contained in paragraph five, I would like to support those with testimony from my client. I'll be very brief about it but — "THE COURT: Paragraph five? "MR. MILLER: Yes, sir. "THE COURT: That is — what he has been denied in prison because of the hold on him? "MR. MILLER: Yes, sir. "THE COURT: I don't — you know, I would take judicial notice of that but I'd have to — because that wouldn't make one bit of difference. ". . . . "THE COURT: . . . So I'll deny your motion for — to dismiss on — because of the delay and the new motions styled 'Motion to Dismiss for Want of Speedy Trial,' that motion is denied. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.