Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

643 So. 2d 631

Hoefer v. Hoefer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 26, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-08-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2002

1 state decisions

Relies on 472 So. 2d 1177 - CU Associates, Inc. v. RB Grove, Inc. · 464 So. 2d 656 - Notarfonzo v. Kline

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-08-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant’s in personam jurisdiction argument fails because it was not timely asserted, Notarfonzo v. Kline, 464 So.2d 656, 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), review denied, 472 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1985), and, in the absence of a record of the evidentiary hearing below, there is no basis to reverse the appealed order. On its face, it is legally sufficient.

¶2AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
/643/so2d/631 · .json · Public domain