643 So. 2d 679 - Hause v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 1995
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 552 So. 2d 1107 - State v. Betancourt · State v. VanKooten · 579 So. 2d 734 - Armstrong v. State · 630 So. 2d 1059 - State v. Davis · Felty v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994), the supreme court, relying on the [State v.] VanKooten [ 522 So.2d 830 Fla.1988] rule, held that nonstate prison sanctions, which include incarceration, jail time, and community control, are disjunctive sentences, and thus combining any or all of them creates a departure sentence for which written reasons must be provided. Id. at 1060.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“[A]ny person sentenced for a felony offense committed after October 1, 1988, whose presumptive sentence is any non-state prison sanction may be sentenced to community control or to a term of incarceration not to exceed 22 months.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coney v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.