643 So. 2d 779 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · Brewster v. Derwinski · 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar · 322 So. 2d 189 - State v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“|n Thus, in order to convict the defendant of attempted second degree murder, you must find (1) that the defendant had specific intent to commit the crime of second degree murder; and (2) that the defendant did an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the commission of the crime of second degree murder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“may infer, as a matter of fact, a specific intent to kill by reason of a specific intent to inflict great bodily harm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.