Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 So. 2d 966 - Windom v. Hunt

643 So. 2d 966 - Windom v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hunt v. State · International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Hatas · 642 So. 2d 1060 - Ex Parte Hunt · Ex Parte Baugh · 583 So. 2d 979 - Ex Parte Coastal Training Institute

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If [the defendants'] testimony was so obviously incriminating that a reasonable person would recognize that to give such testimony would be incriminating, that testimony might well constitute a waiver of the [ Fifth Amendment] privilege [against self-incrimination]. On the other hand, if the testimony was not incriminating, no waiver occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.