Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

643 So. 2d 984

Boykin v. McHenry

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 9, 1993

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · decided 1993-04-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1993

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I respectfully dissent. A review of the record reveals that the attorney for Boykin moved for judgment on two occasions “because they have not proved what is essential or necessary to show the right of the Department of Public Safety ... or ... the Alabama State Trooper to request the test or to show that Ms. Boykin gave her implied consent to be tested....” The gist of those motions was that the department had not shown that there had been a lawful arrest for “driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor” in order to effectuate the “implied consent” law.

¶3The issue was before the trial court, the department failed in its burden of proof, and the judgment should be reversed. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

/643/so2d/984 · .json · Public domain