Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 S.W.2d 292 - State v. Bextermueller

State v. Bextermueller’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2008

18 state decisions

130198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Vitale · State v. Wood · State v. Baker · 71 Ill. 2d 229 - In Re Vitale · State v. Feger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All offenses that are of the same or similar character or based on two or more acts that are part of the same transaction or on two or more acts or transactions that are connected or that constitute parts of a common scheme or plan may be charged in the same indictment or information in separate counts. 3 (emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Notwithstanding Missouri supreme court rule 24.07 [1986], two or more offenses may be charged in the same indictment or information in a separate count for each offense if the offenses charged, whether felonies or misdemeanors or infractions, or any combination thereof, are of the same or similar character or are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.