Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 643 S.W.2d 487 - Crisp v. State

Crisp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bates v. State · Gordon v. Lake · White v. State · Beck v. State · 172 Tex. Crim. 403 - Ex Parte Meyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"An act relating to offenses and criminal penalties under the Texas Controlled Substances Act."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Massey v. State · Ragan v. State
  2. “"No bill, (except general appropriation bills, which may embrace the various subjects and accounts, for and on account of which monies are appropriated) shall contain more than one subject, which shall be expressed in its title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act, which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof, as shall not be expressed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ragan v. State · Ex Parte Crisp

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.