Cooper v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
644 F.2d 1077 · 1981
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Espinoza v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (1985), Bernstein Seawell & Kove v. Bosarge (1987)
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co. · General Electric Co. v. Gilbert · Smith v. Ayer · Harold FRANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Johnny Lee, Intervenor-Appellant, v. BOWMAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is considered to have 'notice of all facts, notice of which can be charged upon the attorney.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress did not intend to condition a claimant's right to sue under Title VII on fortuitous circumstances or events beyond his control which are not spelled out in the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ubsequent litigation has made clear that Franks did not unconditionally reject the constructive notice doctrine for all circumstances in Title VII litigation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.