Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 F.2d 1290 - Dorr, Cooper & Hays v. Wyle

Dorr, Cooper & Hays v. Wyle’s Empirical Analysis

644 F.2d 1290 · 1981

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
October 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2014

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1101981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations · Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation · Re James B Wood and Jethro P Hendersons · United States v. Georgia-Pacific Co. · Conrad v. Pender

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... the court after notice and a hearing may determine whether any payment of money or any transfer of property by the debtor, made directly or indirectly and in contemplation of the filing of a petition under the Code by or against the debtor, to any attorney for services rendered or to be rendered is excessive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e conclude that there is no support in the statutory language, the legislative history, or the case law for the trustee’s theory that the security interest in [counsel for the debtor] ... is voidable in its entirety under Rule 220, independent of the value of the legal services rendered by [debtor’s counsel].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.