Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

644 F.2d 309

Docket No. 80-2118.

Azeff v. Pennsylvania

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) March 18, 1981.

Decided March 27, 1981.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1981-03-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1981

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 495 F. Supp. 102 - Azeff v. Pennsylvania

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1981-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard Kirschner, Jonathan Walters, Kirschner, Walters & Willig, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

¶2Maria Parisi Vickers, Deputy Atty. Gen., John O. J. Shellenberger, Deputy Atty. Gen., Eastern Regional Director, Harvey Bartle, 3rd, Atty. Gen., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

¶3Before ALDISERT and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges, and STERN, District Judge.*

¶5OPINION OF THE COURT

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7We have considered the contentions raised by appellant, and for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion by the Honorable Louis H. Pollak, Azeff v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 495 F.Supp. 102 (E.D.Pa.1980), we conclude that the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

/644/f2d/309 · .json · Public domain