Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 F.2d 445 - United States v. Black

United States v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

644 F.2d 445 · 1981

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
April 1997
most recently cited

26 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1010 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on United States v. Scott · United States v. Jenkins · United States v. Edwards · United States v. Burns · United States v. Lange

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The District Court must determine whether the relevant evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, could be accepted by a reasonably-minded jury as adequate and sufficient to support the conclusion of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The same test applies whether the evidence is direct or circumstantial. All reasonable inferences which tend to support the Government’s case must be accepted. Any conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in the Government’s favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the jury might reasonably conclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is inconsistent with every reasonable hypothesis of the accused's innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it was necessary for the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant] knowingly made a false statement concerning a material fact to HUD as charged in the indictment....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.