Harris v. Wyrick’s Empirical Analysis
644 F.2d 710 · 1981
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2008
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · Duren v. Missouri · Sanchell v. Parratt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the witness’s opportunity to view the defendant at the time of the crime, the witness’s degree of attention at the time of the crime, the accuracy of the witness’s description prior to the identification, the level of certainty expressed by the witness when making the identification, and the length of time that has elapsed between the crime and the confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the underrepresentation of women, generally and on his venire, was due to their systematic exclusion in the jury-selection process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.