Poe v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
644 F.2d 721 · 1981
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2016
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parker v. Harris · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Brinker v. Weinberger · Johnson v. Harris · Dressel v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is pertinent evidence in that it may disclose the severity and continuity of impairments existing before the earning requirement date”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.