Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 F.2d 807 - Sober v. Crist

Sober v. Crist’s Empirical Analysis

644 F.2d 807 · 1981

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Bashor v. Risley (1984), United States v. Newman (1990)

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

2001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · McMann v. Richardson · McCarthy v. United States · Morissette v. United States · Tollett v. Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he record need not necessarily show that every element of the crime was explained in detail to defendant....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he accused should be made aware of possible defenses, at least where the attorney or court is made aware of facts that would constitute such a defense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.