Halebian v. Berv’s Empirical Analysis
644 F.3d 122 · 2011
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 80A
Relies on Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc. · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P. · Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc. · Parke v. Raley · DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exceptions to Rule 12(b)(6)'s general prohibition against considering materials outside the four corners of the complaint”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'is to test, in a streamlined fashion, the formal sufficiency of the plaintiff's statement of a claim for relief without resolving a contest regarding its substantive merits.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“consideration is limited to the factual allegations in [the complaint], which are accepted as true, to documents attached to the complaint as an exhibit or incorporated in it by reference, to matters of which judicial notice may be taken, or to documents either in plaintiff['s] possession or of which plaintiff[ ] had knowledge and relied on in bringing suit.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.