In re Warburgh’s Empirical Analysis
644 F.3d 173 · 2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Minnesota v. Murphy · Spevack v. Klein · In Re Robert J Snyder · Small v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An attorney’s default in disciplinary proceedings is a serious breach of the attorney’s professional obligations to the Court and the public. In such a case, the attorney has not only failed to respond to a Court-sanctioned order, but has done so after the Court already has found good cause to question the attorney’s very competence to continue practicing in this Court. Furthermore, such defaults often seriously handicap the Committee and Court in their efforts to reach a fair determination based on a complete record, and usually result in waste of Committee and Court resources.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Gordon · In re Aranda
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.