Dugboe v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
644 F.3d 462 · 2011
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Tennessee Western District Court)
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kucana v. Holder · Castellano-Chacon v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Liti v. Gonzales · Sarvia-Quintanilla v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service · Dillery v. City of Sandusky
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.