Gaudette v. Panos’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 2 · 7 U.S.C. § 2A · 7 U.S.C. § 6
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran · Miree v. County Georgia Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the state law providing for an express private cause of action prohibits the same conduct as the federal statute supporting an implied cause of action, i.e., fraud in securities transactions, and serves the same policy, i.e., preventing such fraud, the state statute is clearly more analogous to the federal cause of action than the multiform concept of common law fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an alleged conspiracy is distinct from an alleged RICO violation, which, as to Panos, is not dismissed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gaudette v. Panos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.