Ramirez v. STi Prepaid LLC’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “) The Court agrees with the reasoning of the courts that hold that the issue of individual standing is separate and distinct from the inquiry of whether named plaintiffs can meet the requirements to certify a class under Rule 23. See Newberg on Class Actions § 2:5 (4th ed. 2010) (”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 801 F. Supp. 2d 993 - Dremak v. Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc. · 801 F. Supp. 2d 993 - In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.

2. “The relevant question ... is not whether the Named Plaintiffs have standing to sue Defendants — they most certainly do — but whether their injuries are sufficiently similar to those of the purported Class to justify the prosecution of a nationwide class action. This question is ... appropriately answered through the class certification process.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 701 F. Supp. 2d 356 - In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

3. “To succeed in piercing the corporate veil, a plaintiff must allege that the parent completely dominate[s] the finances, policy, and business practice with respect to the subject transaction”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Linus Holding Corp. v. Mark Line Indus., LLC