Lingler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2018
4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parke v. Raley · Weatherford v. State · Cooper v. State · Johnson v. State · Lingler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[The purpose of post-conviction relief is not simply to relitigate claims that might have been litigated on direct appeal. Accordingly, a petitioner who seeks to raise an issue which might have been raised on direct appeal is commonly put to a tougher standard of proof thaln] he would have been had the issue been raised earlier."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tumulty v. State“The post-conviction process is open to prisoners to correct injustice in convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“anything unjust or untrue about the verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.