Gregory v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2016
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Rauer v. United States · Page v. State · Cooper v. State · Slaton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[als in Beno, Gregory sold the same drug to the same informant on several occasions over a short period of time. Presumably, the police could have set up any number of additional transactions against Gregory. While the police may find it necessary to conduct a series of buys, the trial court should be leery of sentencing a defendant to consecutive terms for each count.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Robertson v. State · Rios v. State““The Court finds the following mitigating factors: Defendant is a high school and college graduate. Defendant was dyslexic and attended St. John’s Military Academy. Defendant is remorseful. “The Court finds no statutory mitigating factors. “The Court finds the following aggravating factors: Defendant has a history of criminal activity. On March 18, 1987 defendant received a withheld prosecution for public intoxication, carrying a concealed weapon (handgun) and discharging a firearm in the city limits. “Defendant was convicted on June 4, 1991 for possession of stolen property as a Class D felony.... Defendant was given 18 months at the Department of Correction and ordered to serve ninety days (was released on 7-29-91) and placed on probation for 15 months which the defendant completed. “Defendant had these two prior arrests, both involving firearms and defendant was also carrying a firearm in connection with his cocaine dealings. “Defendant has seventeen years of being actively involved in the illegal use and sale of cocaine and other illegal drugs in this community at the A and B felony level. Defendant is seriously addicted to cocaine. Defendant was earning over $100,000.00 a year from the illegal sale of cocaine in the community. “Defendant has no history of trying to get drug treatment. “Defendant violated the terms of probation by dealing illegal drugs. “Defendant is in need of correctional and rehabilitative treatment that can best be provided by his commitment to a pena”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pritscher v. State“sentenced to the presumptive term of thirty years on each count, to be served consecutively.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rios v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.