Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

644 P.2d 121

Ferguson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1982-04-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on Helfrich v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1982-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRETT, Presiding Judge,

¶1concurs in part and dissents in part:

¶2I concur that this conviction is sufficiently sustained; however, I dissent to the hearsay testimony that consent was granted to record the telephone conversation. For the same reason I dissented to the decision in Helfrich v. State, 640 P.2d 1367 (Okl.Cr.1982). Further, insofar as appellant was found to be indigent at trial, as well as for appeal, I would modify the fine from $5,000.00 to $500.00.

/644/p2d/121 · .json · Public domain