Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 P2D 568 - Wacoche v. State

Wacoche v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Fox v. State (1989), 2006 OK CR 8 - Browning v. State (2006)

25 state decisions

18019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Edwards v. Arizona · Manson v. Brathwaite · Weeks v. United States · Harris v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror shall not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury’s deliberations or as to the effect of anything upon his or another juror’s mind or emotions as influencing him to assent to or dissent from the verdict or indictment or concerning his mental processes during deliberations, [emphasis added]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[wlhen the alleged misconduct occurs subsequent to the submission of the case to the jury, the misconduct is presumed to have prejudiced the defendant and it is incumbent upon the State to show that he was not prejudiced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “However, where it appears that a juror converses with third parties during the trial and prior to deliberations, there must be a showing by the defendant that he was prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.