Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 SE2D 299 - In Re Dp

In Re Dp’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 249 Ga. App. 435 - In Re MLC · 248 Ga. App. 756 - In Re CDE · In re D. H. · 230 Ga. App. 153 - In the Interest of L. G. · 178 Ga. App. 119 - In Re DH

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]nly under compelling circumstances found to exist by clear and convincing proof may a court sever the parent-child custodial relationship.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It has been held that to authorize a termination of parental rights, or even a loss of temporary custody by a child's parents, on the basis of deprivation, the deprivation must be shown to have resulted from unfitness on the part of the parent, that is, either intentional or unintentional misconduct resulting in the abuse or neglect of the child or by what is tantamount to physical or mental incapability to care for the child. [5]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Under Georgia law, a child is deprived if the child `is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for the child's physical, mental, or emotional health or morals.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.