In Re DC’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM · 150 N.C. App. 380 - In Re Hardesty · 114 N.C. App. 253 - In the Matter of Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hile it is certainly the better practice for the petitioner to 'check' the appropriate box on the petition for each ground for adjudication, if the specific factual allegations of the petition are sufficient to put the respondent on notice as to each alleged ground for adjudication, the petition will be adequate.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[b]ecause N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 7B-507 and 907 do not permit the trial court to enter a permanent plan for a juvenile during disposition, respondent did not have statutorily required notice that the trial court would consider a permanent plan for [the minor child], and the trial court did not make findings mandated by sections 7B-907(b), (c), and (f)[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“alleging dependency on the form petition filed on 13 November 2015. The allegations attached to the petition, however, were sufficient to put respondent-mother on notice that dependency would be at issue during the adjudication hearing. The attached specific statement of facts alleged: The child [Kirk] (9 years old) has”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.