Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

644 So. 2d 143

Brailsford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 21, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-10-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2011

2 state decisions

Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Radcliffe James Brailsford was convicted of armed burglary and armed robbery and received consecutive sentences as a habitual offender. We affirm his convictions but reverse his sentences. On rémand, the trial court shall impose concurrent habitual offender sentences because both offenses arose out of a single criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993).

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.
/644/so2d/143 · .json · Public domain