¶1The denial of appellant’s motion for a “proposed order to clarify sentence” is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant seeking relief with respect to gain time by filing either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus. See Searcy v. Singletary, 590 So.2d 1034 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hall v. *355Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
644 So. 2d 354
Dilbert v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 9, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-11-09
Relies on 498 So. 2d 670 - Hall v. Wainwright · Searcy v. Singletary
Decided 1994-11-09