644 So. 2d 451 - Moody v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

cited by 89 later decisions

states following

March 2013

most recently cited

88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Havard v. State (2006), 684 So. 2d 608 - Conner v. State (1996)

88 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · Dufour v. Mississippi · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · Sellers v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“rebuttable presumption that counsel's performance falls within the broad spectrum of reasonable professional assistance.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 722 So. 2d 447 - Williams v. State · 749 So. 2d 1152 - Allen v. State
“show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Evans v. State · Shumpert v. State
“To be successful on an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must meet the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693 (1984), and adopted by this Court. The Strickland test requires a showing of (1) deficiency of counsel's performance (2) sufficient to constitute prejudice to the defense ... based upon the totality of the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Evans v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.