Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 So. 2d 46 - Holcomb v. State

644 So. 2d 46 - Holcomb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2018

3 state decisions

10199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Calandra · 516 So. 2d 831 - Ex Parte Caffie · 445 So. 2d 573 - Smith v. State · United States v. Wiygul

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Strict adherence to the rules of evidence is not required in revocation proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.